Beyond medicalisation.

نویسنده

  • Nikolas Rose
چکیده

References 1 Illich I. Medical nemesis. New York: Pantheon, 1975: 4, 35. 2 Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1087–110. 3 Tomes N. Patients or health care consumers? Why the history of contested terms matters. In Stevens R, Rosenberg C, Burns, LR, eds. History and health policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2006: 83–110. 4 Williams S, Calnan, M. The limits of “medicalization”: modern medicine and the lay populace in “late modernity.” Soc Sci Med 1996; 42: 1609–20. 5 Conrad P. The shifting engines of medicalization. J Health Soc Behav 2005; 46: 3–14. 6 Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991 7 Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage, 1992. 8 University of Washington. Evidence-based practice tools summary. http://healthlinks.washington.edu/ebp/ebptools.html (accessed Nov 22, 2006). 9 Cochrane Consumer Network. About CCNet. http://www.cochrane. org/consumers/about.htm (accessed Nov 22, 2006). 10 Bastian H. Planning consumer participation in review groups. Cochrane News 1998; 12: 6–7. 11 Metzl J. Prozac on the couch. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003. 12 Metzl J, Riba M. Understanding the symbolic value of medications: a brief review. Prim Psych 2003; 10: 45–48. 13 Epstein S. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 14 Lerner BH. The breast cancer wars: hope, fear, and the pursuit of a cure in twentieth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. 15 Tomes N. The patient as a policy factor: a historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health. Health Aff 2006; 25: 720–29.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Mistaking the Map for the Territory: What Society Does With Medicine; Comment on “Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine”

Van Dijk et al describe how society’s influence on medicine drives both medicalisation and overdiagnosis, and allege that a major political and ethical concern regarding our increasingly interpreting the world through a biomedical lens is that it serves to individualise and depoliticize social problems. I argue that for medicalisation to serve this purpose, it would have to exclude the possibil...

متن کامل

Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility.

There is a significant class disparity within the provision of medical treatments for infertility in the United States. Common explanations attribute this inequality to financial inaccessibility due to sparse insurance coverage and exorbitant costs. However, little is known as to why disparities still exist without the presence of such constraints, such as in states with comprehensive insurance...

متن کامل

Medicalisation and Cesarean Section Delivery

This chapter discusses elaborately the current discourse on medicalisation in society. The debate on medicalisation of human health by medical sociologists has been discussed to understand the different issues regarding use of medical technology and human health. The medicalisation of human body in general has received lot of attention both theoretically and empirically in the last few decades....

متن کامل

Overdiagnosis: An Important Issue That Demands Rigour and Precision; Comment on “Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine”

Van Dijk and colleagues present three cases to illustrate and discuss the relationship between medicalisation and overdiagnosis. In this commentary, I consider each of the case studies in turn, and in doing so emphasise two main points. The first is that it is not possible to assess whether overdiagnosis is occurring based solely on incidence rates: it is necessary also to have data about the b...

متن کامل

Medicalisation and Overdiagnosis: What Society Does to Medicine

The concept of overdiagnosis is a dominant topic in medical literature and discussions. In research that targets overdiagnosis, medicalisation is often presented as the societal and individual burden of unnecessary medical expansion. In this way, the focus lies on the influence of medicine on society, neglecting the possible influence of society on medicine. In this perspective, we aim to provi...

متن کامل

Medicalisation in the 21st century: introduction.

What is medicalisation? What are its causes and eff ects? Who benefi ts from medicalisation, and who is harmed? What, if anything, should be done about it? Answers to these questions would have seemed quite obvious in the 1970s, when the term entered academic and medical publications: medicalisation, the expansion of medical authority into the domains of everyday existence, was promoted by doct...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Lancet

دوره 369 9562  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007